The premise holds out the promise of a lot of interesting visuals.

But taking the logline at face value:? the 1st part? says she fulfills her dream by merely running? in the rally.? The stakes seem to be endurance, not victory.? And then the 2nd half says she’s? in a? (competitive) race, not a (social) rally.

So what is it, a rally or a race?? (Technically? a rally need not to be? a race.? In fact, most rallies are social events, bikers riding together for the love of the motorcycling, not competing against each other.)

And if she got injured while racing competitively, doesn’t that mean she was already racing against her boyfriend?? So what’s the problem?? If he helps her recover, doesn’t he realize he’s aiding and abetting her competing against him?

So why would it be a wedge issue in their relationship?? Particularly since plenty of racers remain friends even though they compete against each other.? If it does threaten their relationship, whose at fault?? Isn’t it the guy’s? for being an old-fashioned sexist pig?? So doesn’t that imply that if she owns the plot, he owns the character arc because he’s the one who needs to change his attitude?

Is the emotional engine driving the movie the relationship or the racing?