Sign Up Sign Up

Captcha Click on image to update the captcha.

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In Sign In

Forgot Password?

If you'd like access, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Captcha Click on image to update the captcha.

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sorry, you do not have permission to ask a question, You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

To see everything, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Logline It! Logo Logline It! Logo
Sign InSign Up

Logline It!

Logline It! Navigation

  • Sign Up
  • Logline Generator
  • Learn our simple Logline Formula
  • Search Loglines
Search
Post Your Logline

Mobile menu

Close
Post Your Logline
  • Signup
  • Sign Up
  • Logline Generator
  • Learn our simple Logline Formula
  • Search Loglines
slsmithLogliner
Posted: October 22, 20162016-10-22T12:15:57+10:00 2016-10-22T12:15:57+10:00In: SciFi

In 2050 L.A., a detective accused of murder must clear her name by catching the real suspect: a famous actress cloned from her DNA. MINORITY REPORT meets ORPHAN BLACK.

In 2050 L.A., a detective accused of murder must clear her name by catching the real suspect: a famous actress cloned from her DNA. MINORITY REPORT meets ORPHAN BLACK.
  • 1
  • 4 4 Reviews
  • 1,290 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook

    Post a review
    Cancel reply

    You must login to add an answer.

    Forgot Password?

    To see everything, Sign Up Here

    4 Reviews

    • Voted
    • Oldest
    • Recent
    1. dpg Singularity
      2016-10-22T12:55:44+10:00Added an answer on October 22, 2016 at 12:55 pm

      I think it’s a pretty solid and clear concept.

      Three minor suggestions:

      1] “Culprit” instead of “suspect” because she doesn’t have a suspect when she starts her investigation. (Does she?) ?Only the need to find and ID a culprit, an unidentified perp.

      2] There is no need for “Minority Report meets Orphan Black”. ?Ye hoary ?”X meets Y” gimmick is discouraged in loglines; it’s better saved for the pitch. ?In loglines, a concept should be strong enough to stand on its own without ?explicitly referencing other films. ?And ?I think this one is strong enough.

      3] I see no need to include “famous actress” in the logline . ?I presume the ?ID of the culprit , that it’s a “famous actress”, is the late 2nd Act Big Reveal, and loglines should not contain spoilers, give away Big Reveals. ?The logline should state her objective goal based only on what she knows at the start of the 2nd Act. ?

      So:

      In 2050 L.A., a detective accused of murder must clear her name by finding the real culprit, a woman cloned from her DNA.
      (23 words)

      • 0
      • Reply
      • Share
        Share
        • Share on Facebook
        • Share on Twitter
        • Share on LinkedIn
        • Share on WhatsApp
    2. dpg Singularity
      2016-10-23T03:10:45+10:00Added an answer on October 23, 2016 at 3:10 am

      I confused. ?Please clarify. ?Do you mean to say that she initially goes after the wrong clone? ??IOW: the actress is a dramatic decoy, a false lead. ?That’s what the entire 2nd Act is about, following a dramatic dead end? ?

      Because the action described in a logline triggered by the inciting accident is always understood to be what the entire 2nd Act is about.

      • 0
      • Reply
      • Share
        Share
        • Share on Facebook
        • Share on Twitter
        • Share on LinkedIn
        • Share on WhatsApp
    3. Neer Shelter Singularity
      2016-10-23T04:12:48+10:00Added an answer on October 23, 2016 at 4:12 am

      What does she do in act 3 that clears her name?

      • 0
      • Reply
      • Share
        Share
        • Share on Facebook
        • Share on Twitter
        • Share on LinkedIn
        • Share on WhatsApp
    4. dpg Singularity
      2016-10-23T06:02:03+10:00Added an answer on October 23, 2016 at 6:02 am

      What’s the hook of your story? Hollyweird glitter? ?Or cloning? ?I opt for the latter. ??

      I think your concept is strong enough to not need some pixie dust, some Hollyweird glitter. ?But if you insist, make the detective the prime suspect in the murder of a Hollyweird celebrity. ?Now you’ve got your glitter. And after all, shouldn’t she be accused of killing someone significant? ?(And you can still keep the actress clone as a suspect because she has a motive: eliminating a competitor, or she’s a jealous jilted lover. Whatever Hollyweird folks feud about.)

      I see you posted an almost identical logline for this story in March. ?I presume you’ve made a lot of headway with script since then. ?Best wishes for your writing.

      • 0
      • Reply
      • Share
        Share
        • Share on Facebook
        • Share on Twitter
        • Share on LinkedIn
        • Share on WhatsApp

    Sidebar

    Stats

    • Loglines 7,997
    • Reviews 32,189
    • Best Reviews 629
    • Users 3,710

    screenwriting courses

    Adv 120x600

    aalan

    Explore

    • Signup

    Footer

    © 2022 Karel Segers. All Rights Reserved
    With Love from Immersion Screenwriting.