Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
Logline: After killing each other in a muddy ravine on Guadalcanal, a Japanese soldier and an American Marine awaken as unwillingly tethered ghosts and spend decades protecting the grandson born from their families’ impossible union—bickering across wars, cultures, and generations as they search for redemption and peace. Genre: Primary: Historical Fantasy Drama Secondary: War Drama / Supernatural Family Saga
This is a fresh and highly dramatic premise. Excellent! The two protagonists makes it complex, but not impossible. The structure works: two protagonists, a catalyst, an action, a conflict, a theme. But "unwillingly tethered" is a little clunky as an adverb-plus-adjective pair; "tethered against theiRead more
This is a fresh and highly dramatic premise. Excellent! The two protagonists makes it complex, but not impossible.
The structure works: two protagonists, a catalyst, an action, a conflict, a theme. But “unwillingly tethered” is a little clunky as an adverb-plus-adjective pair; “tethered against their will” or just “tethered” reads cleaner.
“Search for redemption and peace” is the theme rather than something we can watch; if both ghosts are chasing an internal state, we don’t get a visible goal to follow.
The character descriptions tell us their armies but nothing about who these men are; what kind of soldier each one was would tell us how the bickering plays.
The genre stack reads overdetermined (primary and secondary, three or four labels), and a single tonal cue inside the logline would do the work without needing the disclaimer below.
But the story is genuinely fresh: enemy soldiers who killed each other on Guadalcanal becoming tethered ghosts to a shared bloodline they didn’t know they’d share is a strong premise, and the bickering across decades has real comedy potential alongside the drama. What’s missing is the specific stake. Why are they bound to him? What happens if they fail? And what makes the union “impossible”? A concrete stake and a concrete reason would replace the abstract “search for redemption” with something we can watch.
See lessWhen the Sheriff of Sweetwater, Mars stumbles on a plan to destroy the town to make room for an illegal worm farm, he and his friends have to defend the town from destruction by a megalomaniac Soybean Magnate.
The structure works: we know who, what's at stake, who's against him, and what he has to do. Where it gets clunky: "destroy" and "destruction" come back three times in close range, and "destruction by a megalomaniac Soybean Magnate" is a passive construction; flipping it to "from a megalomaniac SoybRead more
The structure works: we know who, what’s at stake, who’s against him, and what he has to do. Where it gets clunky: “destroy” and “destruction” come back three times in close range, and “destruction by a megalomaniac Soybean Magnate” is a passive construction; flipping it to “from a megalomaniac Soybean Magnate” picks up the pace.
See lessThe character description tells us his job but nothing about who he is as a person (“languid sheriff” or “self-centred weather man” would tell us how he behaves before the story even starts.)
The place names don’t earn their space either; a descriptor of the town and its world would tell us more than “Sweetwater, Mars” does. But the story is fun: an off-world Western with an illegal worm farm and a Soybean Magnate as antagonist places this on a sci-fi comedy shelf you can already see.
What’s missing is the sheriff’s personal stake. Defending a town reads generic until we know what he has to lose. And “megalomaniac” is the lazy version of the villain; a specific quirk on the Soybean Magnate would make him memorable.
An American teen is kidnapped by a Bangkok crime lord, who grooms her first as his protégé and then as his bride. But when she discovers he was her late mother’s his secret lover, she uses his methods to destroy him and seize his empire.
The logline runs 54 words across two sentences, which works quite well for the longer-logline shape with a Mid Point Reversal, where "But when" marks the MPR turn. I would even consider rolling it into one sentence. But that's personal preference. The structure maps cleanly: setup, action 1, MPR, acRead more
The logline runs 54 words across two sentences, which works quite well for the longer-logline shape with a Mid Point Reversal, where “But when” marks the MPR turn. I would even consider rolling it into one sentence. But that’s personal preference.
See lessThe structure maps cleanly: setup, action 1, MPR, action 2. The only problem: Action 1 is not the main character’s action, which means that in this logline our MC only becomes active after the MPR, which is late.
The character description is another weak spot. “An American teen” gives geography but no psychology (“languid sheriff” or “self-centred weather man” shows what a character intro should do).
But the story is intriguing: The kidnapping, the protégé-then-bride grooming, and the mother-as-secret-lover discovery promise a layered revenge tail with real dramatic stakes, and the “use his methods to destroy him” payoff connects the grooming setup to the third act in a satisfying loop. A typo to clean: “her late mother’s his secret lover” has an extra “his”. The material is heavy (grooming of a minor, forced marriage), so a single tonal cue in the logline would help us place the genre.