During the BLM riots, a well-to-do couple takes in and tends to a wounded a black man. But when they discover he may be wanted for murdering a cop, they must decide whether to believe in his innocence, or face the consequences of harboring a cop killer.
Michael FineLogliner
During the BLM riots, a well-to-do couple takes in and tends to a wounded a black man. But when they discover he may be wanted for murdering a cop, they must decide whether to believe in his innocence, or face the consequences of harboring a cop killer.
Share
The concept is solid, however logically, it isn’t up to the leads to decide whether the wounded man is innocent or guilty, it is up to a judge. Deciding innocence or guilt is above their pay grade.
As a result, you need to add another element, that he is hunted by some specific person (Or people) out for vengeance. These people don’t care about justice just vengeance. So it may be immoral for the leads to hand him over to the police since some in the police force might not want him to go to trial but might just want him dead.
In adding that element, now handing him over to the authorities might be immoral, but harboring him might be immoral also, thus the Delima and the conflict.