Have an account? Sign In Now
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
When an idealistic attorney discovers the man she freed from prison is a cold-blooded killer she chooses payback over ethics and mounts a stunning plan to put him back inside.
Rewrite: ?When an idealistic attorney discovers the man she freed from prison - and later married - is a sociopathic killer, she sets him up for a murder he hasn?t yet committed.? Thinking of adding the married part back in for further motivation, tension, and a reason why the characters are even arRead more
Rewrite:
?When an idealistic attorney discovers the man she freed from prison – and later married – is a sociopathic killer, she sets him up for a murder he hasn?t yet committed.?
Thinking of adding the married part back in for further motivation, tension, and a reason why the characters are even around each other. Because normally a lawyer wouldn?t even be around an ex-client, and this way I can turn him into a violent abuser.
Thinking I?ll have her hide another victim that he?s beaten into an inch of her life, but my lawyer won?t succeed in that plan. She?ll eventually succeed in setting him up for her OWN murder and get away with his $$ and maybe a child. The child would provide that extra motivation to get the hell out and put him behind bars.
See lessA suicidal mercenary sets out to rescue the girl he was hired to protect, the girl who gave him a reason to live, after she’s kidnapped for ransom.
No argument there. Normally the flaw or issue implies or touches on the theme or arc and here I figured it's the opposite by specifying redemption. If I were working on this idea, there would be a couple of more logline attempts.
No argument there. Normally the flaw or issue implies or touches on the theme or arc and here I figured it’s the opposite by specifying redemption. If I were working on this idea, there would be a couple of more logline attempts.
See lessIn 1961, a British double agent, living under a new alias, must thwart a corrupt former colleague who threatens to expose his existence to a secret organisation of Nazis, unless he takes part in his complex game of human chess.
Forced and pawn are not proactive. His plan within the situation should be stated? (In the next log - I?ll put down he?s planning to play them off against each other. For something that is twisty-turny (this is my homage to Hitchcock?s Vertigo, Notorious, etc) - it is hard to know how much to give aRead more
Forced and pawn are not proactive. His plan within the situation should be stated?
(In the next log – I?ll put down he?s planning to play them off against each other. For something that is twisty-turny (this is my homage to Hitchcock?s Vertigo, Notorious, etc) – it is hard to know how much to give away.?
Why the elaborate blackmail plan?
The corrupt government agent/former colleague is also up to no good.
How long can the blackmail last?
The blackmail is a catalyst. Once the protagonist is entangled in this mess of double agendas and hidden schemes, it should become increasingly hard to get out of it.
Okay. I?ll post in a few days – with new loglines. Cheers.
Also (and for all four) shall I post in this thread or start a new one?
See less