In the future, AI is able to determine who has committed a crime, but when it appears to frame a rookie cop of murder, she must out smart a machine thinking 2 steps ahead to prove her innocence.

I’d really like a sense of this cop’s inner arc. What does she need to learn in order to prevail at the end? Is there something, some fatal flaw that she needs to overcome or come to terms with, or some critical theme-statement-esque life lesson she’s yet to learn that this particular journey will teach her?
Here’s a way you might be able to frame it:
When framed for a murder she didn’t commit, a rookie cop must [[insert arc here]] in order to prove her innocence and overcome the AI that framed her.
—
If her antagonist is an AI, it sounds like you might be exploring the instinct/machine, or nature/industry dichotomy that films like Star Wars and the LOTR trilogy.
e.g. When framed for a murder she didn’t commit, a rookie cop must learn to trust her instincts in order to prove her innocence and overcome the AI that framed her.
—
Or you might want her to think more like a machine:
e.g. When framed for a murder she didn’t commit, a rookie cop must become a better strategic thinker than the AI that framed her, in order to prove her innocence.