A young newlywed couple must fight for their lives when they become the targets of vengeance after a fatal accident involving the neighbors creepy kids.
Share
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
I’m going to shorten this a little. See how it looks: (This is shortened from your second alternative example up above)
———————————–
“After a fatal accident, bickering newlyweds become targets of a vengeful father and must work together to survive.”
Richiev’s version does, as you said, cut right to the heart of the plot. I think the inciting incident (of Richiev’s version) could do with clarifying the relationship between the fatal accident and the father, and also the accident and the newlyweds. How those three elements relate to each other is what the entire plot hangs on.
A logline shouldn’t be vague. What you’re aiming for (in my opinion) is for the what the reader sees in their head to be as close to yours as possible. As you mentioned yourself, it’s the specifics of the story that set it apart from other similar ideas.
After a body is discovered, a local law enforcer must track down the killer before others die.
Consider the above. It’s a bit vague, right? This logline could apply to countless crime dramas. The film I was imagining in my head was actually Jaws. Specificity is key!
Title: RHSC. In my opinion, I would consider other options. Using an acronym that isn’t part of everyday language, and I’m guessing, probably won’t have “(Red-Headed Step Child)” underneath, won’t mean a lot to people. The title is a really important element in this process and it must work really well with the logline. In my head, someone reads the title, then the logline, then back to the title, and understands 100% why that’s what this is called. I’m gonna use Jaws again – imagine you saw the title, then read a logline, then the title again – it makes perfect sense, right? If the logline focuses on the aftermath of a child’s death – absolutely understand why this child would be referenced in the title – something like “The Boy Next Door” would work really well (in my opinion). It’s a well-known phrase but you’re subverting the expectation straight out of the gate by making it about this kid’s death instead of a rom-com. If the logline makes it clear that this couple were involved in the death of the boy next door and the kid’s father wants revenge…. then you read the title again… makes sense to me.
Anyway… welcome to the site. Hope you stick around. Check out other people’s loglines, read the comments, and, ideally, add your own thoughts. The best way to develop your own skills is by learning to recognise common problems with other people’s loglines and then try (this is the tricky bit!) to apply what you’ve learnt to your next one. Loglines are really tough though – they have to do so much with so little and critiquing is sooooooo much easier than writing your own!
Richiev, as usual, cuts to the chase.
However, if the color of the child’s hair matters to the plot, if it is a triggering element in the inciting incident (for some irrational reason, it provokes the antagonist), then perhaps it needs to be an element of the logline.
Hi Dusty,
I gave this a go and added some stuff. (My interpretation from reading the original logline.)
After they accidentally kill a neighbour in a fatal car crash, a newlywed couple fight to stay alive, as the man’s creepy kids begin a campaign of revenge.
I made the fatal accident more specific.
Most newlyweds are young – so I’m hoping the reader will fill that in.
Admittedly, my logline reminds me of https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1020530/