L.A. Confidential
dpgSingularity
Three cops, bitter rivals, fight each other and a corrupt system to unravel a conspiracy to take over organized crime in 1950’s L.A.
Share
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
Or, for those who clamor upon an inciting incident:
After a bloody late night massacre, three cops, bitter rivals, fight each other and a corrupt system to unravel a conspiracy to take over organized crime in 1950?s L.A.
(29 words)
However, I would point out that the massacre at the Night Owl coffee shop ?occurs about 30 minutes into the film; it kicks off?the 2nd Act of the film. ?Almost the ?entirety of the 1st Act focuses on the bitter rivalry among the 3 principals and corruption within the police department.
“…Almost the ?entirety of the 1st Act focuses on the bitter rivalry among the 3 principals and corruption within the police department…”
That’s fine, some stories require a lengthy setup before the plot kicks in. In this case, I believe they made the right choice as it’s the character dynamics, and the differences between their respective modus operandis, that add a layer of interest to the story. I prefer your second version (you’re on to me) I’m a sucker for a good inciting incident…
I’d drop the late night description as what’s important is the fact that there was a massacre, streamline the MC’s descriptions and not mention they’ll fight each other – it’s obvious they will if they’re bitter rivals.
E.g:
After a bloody massacre, three bitter rival cops fight a corrupt system to unravel a conspiracy to take over organized crime in 1950?s L.A.
And at 24 words, it’s one word under par…
I agree with you, Nir Shelter, that “late night” can go. ?However, I prefer ?”fight each other and a corrupt system” ?because Bud White and Edmund Exley characters literally fight each other (twice). ? And I think that’s an important part of the story hook. ?Cops are always fighting corruption in films (within the department and society at large), but how are they also fighting — literally — each other? ?So:
After a bloody massacre, three feuding cops fight each other and a corrupt system to unravel a conspiracy to take over organized crime in 1950?s L.A.
(26 words )
And btw:? their feuding, their inability to even peacefully co-exist as rivals,? is their character flaw.? Only after they stop fighting each other and partner up to fight the bad guys can they defeat the conspiracy.