Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
After uncovering a conspiracy plotted by the king a Templar is forced to intervene in the king’s plot before it leads to civil war.
If I understand the premise, a merchant knight wants to prevent war because it's bad for his business.Well, peace is always a noble cause, but as structured, the story seems to be about a man pursuing it for his own materialistic gain. ?A main character can start out motivated ?for primarily selfishRead more
If I understand the premise, a merchant knight wants to prevent war because it’s bad for his business.
Well, peace is always a noble cause, but as structured, the story seems to be about a man pursuing it for his own materialistic gain. ?A main character can start out motivated ?for primarily selfish reasons, but those are insufficient goals to maintain an audience’s interest and empathy. ?Ultimately, he should be struggling for some value more important than his profit margin, for the sake of others at the expense of his own bottom line.
And isn’t that what a knight is supposed to do — fight for others, not for himself, ?for causes greater than his own gain?
In any event, as noted, the logline is short on specifics. ?It needs to indicate a specific adversary, the primary character conspiring to break the peace.
See lessHundreds of years into the future, when war erupts between a terrorist organization and all the countries of the world, a naive, talented, orphan, unknowingly made to kill, is dragged into the war and forced to confront the harsh realities of war by piloting a deadly machine to bring peace to the world while protecting the ones who are important to him.
As the logline is constructed, the protagonist is portrayed as a passive character. ?He has no objective goal of his own; his goal is dictated by others. The story is driven by decisions being made about him by anonymous others. ?He's "made to kill", "dragged into a war", "forced to confront".BummerRead more
As the logline is constructed, the protagonist is portrayed as a passive character. ?He has no objective goal of his own; his goal is dictated by others. The story is driven by decisions being made about him by anonymous others. ?He’s “made to kill”, “dragged into a war”, “forced to confront”.
Bummer. ?I feel sorry for the kid. ?But that’s?the wrong emotional currency to invest in his story.
The kid can start out as a sacrificial pawn in somebody else’s chess game. ?But a plot should kick in such that he takes charge of his life, his fate, ?becomes a free will agent, promotes himself from a pawn to a king.
?Which I know is illegal in chess but that’s heroes do — break the arbitrary rules in a game rigged against them.
See lessA washed-up news anchor and self-help aficionado, Buck Walsh, finds what may be the saving grace of his career: the lost family home videos from an unsolved double homicide. But watching all 50 minutes of the found footage extravaganza unleashes paranormal forces inside Channel 93’s Public Access TV studio. Buck must put his self-help lessons to the test and discover the demon’s true identity before he becomes the next victim.
Survival is what is at stake. ?And because life or death stakes is always bad for the character, it's good for the story because it amps up dramatic tension.But it should not be confused with?the objective goal. For the purpose of a dramatic plot, they are not the same. ?Why? ?Because mere survivalRead more
Survival is what is at stake. ?And because life or death stakes is always bad for the character, it’s good for the story because it amps up dramatic tension.
But it should not be confused with?the objective goal. For the purpose of a dramatic plot, they are not the same. ?Why? ?Because mere survival is generic — everyone wants to stay alive. ? What distinguishes one life-or-death film from another is not the desire to live, but HOW the character struggles to survive. ?The how is the objective goal, a plan, scheme, a course of action to not just live but to defeat/destroy the threat.
In both Alien and Aliens, Ridley (and everyone else) is in mortal danger of become?hosts for the next generation of aliens.? Obviously, they want to ?live. So in both movies Ripely develops a specific plan, an objective goal to stay alive: evacuate ?and nuke the facility to not merely live but also kill the alien. ? And HOW the plan is executed is what makes the movies so compelling, and Ridley such a strong character.
(And actually, in Alien, evacuate and nuke is Plan “B”. ?Plan “A” — the original objective goal of the crew is to systematically sweep the ship and capture the infant alien.??But when Plan “A” fails, ?Ripley devises Plan “B”, another objective goal.)
So what’s your character’s plan Plan “A” once he realizes that his life is in mortal danger?
Solving the mysterious murder, while it seems to be integral to your story, ?unnecessarily clutters up the logline. ?Isn’t one of the reveals, that the “paranormal forces” is the cause of the mysterious murder? ?Case it solved at that point, ?right? ?End of story, end of film, FADE OUT to screen credits, right?
Well, if I’m deciphering the logline right, that’s not the end of the film. ?It’s probably ?a mid-story reveal. ?The real plot is what the protagonist must do after he realizes this “paranormal force” killed and will kill again.
And if, given the nature of the paranormal, the threat can’t be destroyed then Plan “A” or “B” or “C” is to at least put the evil “genie” back in the lamp, or in this case the video where it lay dormant, trapped for ?50 years. ?Which ?keeps options open for a sequel, a franchise. ?And that’s the potential I can see in this story. ?
But first things first.
See less