Australia. 1916. After the death toll at Gallipoli, a group of friends are forced to choose between their lives at home or the call of duty in France. They soon find themselves in some of the worst battles the world had ever seen.

“After the death toll at Gallipoli”

I may be wrong (I’m not a native English speaker) but it seems to me that ‘death toll’ doesn’t refer to an event, or a point in time but rather a number, an amount. In that case the phrase would be grammatically incorrect. If I am right, it would be embarrassing as this type of mistake should not make it onto the web site of the federal funding agency, reporting on the projects they have funded.

“a group of friends are forced to choose between their lives at home or the call of duty in France.”

This is dramatically a powerful moment, but it is only a moment. A decision never carries more than a sequence in a movie.

So the only other thing this logline really gives us is “a group of friends go to war”.

My question: what makes this movie different from every other war movie? What is interesting about the characters? If there is no central character – God help me, I cannot remember a local film that managed this satisfactorily since Lantana – then why does it need to be a group? Will their friendship be torn apart? And what value(s) or theme(s) are at stake?

Another example of lots of words but really not much of a selling point.