Being forbidden to love maakes managing the world's perception of love easy. But when Rose experiences love for himself he puts his job and existence at stake.

Rose = Eros = Cupid (get it?) so yes its worth the trouble for me personally. If guys can get away with “Ashley” and girls with “jack” then I don’t mind.

Would changing Perception of “love” to “romance” clear up some confusion? I see I always confuse people with my log-lines.

People can love, it’s just that they THINK they fall in love, but most of the time someone like Rose is pulling the strings. So it isn’t Rose controlling if people love or not, but rather how they process the idea to keep people in the illusion of true love exists or what have you.

I tried putting the irony there by having Rose do his job but then break the rule that allows him to do his job effectively.

Of course I don’t have paragraphs likes these to describe the movie so If I didn’t communicate these things effectively how can I do so?

Thanks for your help! I really appreciate it.

Being forbidden to love makes Rose’s job of managing the worlds perception of romance easy. But when he experiences the emotion for himself, he puts his job and existence at stake.

Less confusing?

That’s the thing he isn’t a god, he’s more like an agent. One person out of a single police force type of thing. Think Adjustment Bureau. But the price the pay is his own existence, and job. But I can’t go into that much detail or else it isn’t a log line anymore right?

Glad I didn’t, it has Nicholas Cage. But on another note I can proudly say this idea is nowhere near the ballpark of that one. Thanks for the comparison.