When his revengeful ex-wife murders one of his neighbors, a dismissed errant detective must use his unorthodox methods to help the police force bring her to justice.
WaveLogliner
When his revengeful ex-wife murders one of his neighbors, a dismissed errant detective must use his unorthodox methods to help the police force bring her to justice.
Share
>>>I was wondering, how the volountary/forced OG affects the quality or viability of the logline? I feel that this is an important point.
Good question, FFF.
When the protagonist voluntarily commits to the objective goal , then the question arises in my mind ?as to the quality and viability of the protagonist’s motivation. ?How does the inciting incident hook into the protagonist’s psychology such that it motivates him to break out of the comfy cage of the status quo, venture into the treacherous unknown, engage in risky behavior?
Well, you can’t spell that all out in a logline, obviously, but it should be implicit, ?a factor a logline reader can intuitively grasp. ?When an action is voluntary then the protagonist has to have a good reason for doing it, right?
In this logline, the detective’s decision to solve the case is not forced upon him. ? If he were still on the force, having the case assigned to him would be a straightforward, credible causal link between the inciting incident and the objective goal.
But he’s been fired. ?So his action is voluntary. ?He has to opt in.
And he does. ?Why? ?What is the psychological hook of the inciting incident that motivates him to opt in?
Well, he ?is — or was — a detective. So ?how about he still has a habit for the hunt? ?His response is Pavlovian. ?Well, that could be a factor, but is that sufficient enough a motivation to kick off the plot?
And she’s a neighbor. ?But how good a neighbor? ?Did they frequently chat, exchange holiday gifts, reciprocate with mutual acts of kindness and assistance? ?IOW: what were the bonds of friendship that would motivate him to solve the mystery case? ?How involved was he in her life that emotionally justifies his getting involved in her death? ?We don’t have a clue.
But if they were lovers — ?well, now the psychological hook is obvious and strong. No elaboration is needed.
Take away: the voluntary-involuntary question in my template cues me to consider the viability of the link between the inciting incident and the objective goal.
That thing DPG wrote…
Here’s my take ?by parsing and analyzing your logline through my template for evaluating loglines. ?Fwiw and hope it is of value:
1] how does they know his ex is the prime suspect?
2] And what’s so compelling about the case that he get involved,?must? solve it? ?Why doesn’t he leave it to the cops?