Already a member?
9 reviews
girlbad:
Thanks for the clarification.? So you are making a factual documentary, not a fictionalized dramatization of her life? (Unfortunately, documentary? currently is not in the list of genres)? If so, I suggest framing the narrative? not in terms of "was notorious"? because that's inert in terms evoking a sense of dramatic conflict and casts her in the role a passive victim of a bad press.
Well, she was the? victim of bad publicity, but she was not passive.? She was the protagonist of her own life story, and in any documentary or drama, the protagonist is by definition proactive. So she needs to be portrayed as such, as a rebel who defied conventional norms, an outsider who practiced her art (and her beliefs) in spite of the controversies that swirled around her.
girlbad:
Thanks for the clarification.? So you are making a factual documentary, not a fictionalized dramatization of her life? (Unfortunately, documentary? currently is not in the list of genres)? If so, I suggest framing the narrative? not in terms of "was notorious"? because that's inert in terms evoking a sense of dramatic conflict and casts her in the role a passive victim of a bad press.
Well, she was the? victim of bad publicity, but she was not passive.? She was the protagonist of her own life story, and in any documentary or drama, the protagonist is by definition proactive. So she needs to be portrayed as such, as a rebel who defied conventional norms, an outsider who practiced her art (and her beliefs) in spite of the controversies that swirled around her.
Sex Magic, witchcraft, obscene art, a famous conductor... In 1950s Sydney, Rosaleen Norton was notorious, but the tabloid scandals overshadowed her artistic genius.