Sign Up Sign Up

Captcha Click on image to update the captcha.

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In Sign In

Forgot Password?

If you'd like access, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Captcha Click on image to update the captcha.

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sorry, you do not have permission to ask a question, You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

To see everything, Sign Up Here

Sorry, you do not have permission to ask a question, You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

To see everything, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Logline It! Logo Logline It! Logo
Sign InSign Up

Logline It!

Logline It! Navigation

  • Sign Up
  • Logline Generator
  • Learn our simple Logline Formula
  • Search Loglines
Search
Post Your Logline

Mobile menu

Close
Post Your Logline
  • Signup
  • Sign Up
  • Logline Generator
  • Learn our simple Logline Formula
  • Search Loglines
  • About
  • Questions
  • Answers
  • Best Answers
  1. Posted: November 2, 2014In: Public

    In the final moments before facing the firing squad, the charismatic leader of a murderous robbery gang makes one last request: to have her confession heard by the priest who was once her lover.

    dpg Singularity
    Added an answer on November 8, 2014 at 10:17 am

    I don't know what difference the connotations "sweethearts" and "lovers" convey on your side of the Atlantic pond, but on my side "sweethearts" weakly suggests their relationship was also sexual, whereas "lovers" strongly suggests it was. Otherwise I would not have inquired. So if someday cruel andRead more

    I don’t know what difference the connotations “sweethearts” and “lovers” convey on your side of the Atlantic pond, but on my side “sweethearts” weakly suggests their relationship was also sexual, whereas “lovers” strongly suggests it was. Otherwise I would not have inquired.

    So if someday cruel and capricious fortune should compel you to pitch your story on this side of the pond to Hollyweird, I advise using the word “lovers”. fwiw.

    As for your latest iterations, I’ll have to ruminate.

    See less
    • 0
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
  2. Posted: November 2, 2014In: Public

    In the final moments before facing the firing squad, the charismatic leader of a murderous robbery gang makes one last request: to have her confession heard by the priest who was once her lover.

    dpg Singularity
    Added an answer on November 8, 2014 at 9:30 am

    Please clarify their past relationship. I notice that in all the iterations, whenever some of us imply or explicitly state that they were more than just sweethearts, that they were lovers, you have reverted to the "sweetheart" tag to describe their earlier relationship. Is it your concept that theyRead more

    Please clarify their past relationship. I notice that in all the iterations, whenever some of us imply or explicitly state that they were more than just sweethearts, that they were lovers, you have reverted to the “sweetheart” tag to describe their earlier relationship.

    Is it your concept that they were never lovers, that whatever romantic current flowed between them was never consummated? And if that is the case, what is your reasoning for that choice?

    See less
    • 0
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
  3. Posted: November 2, 2014In: Public

    In the final moments before facing the firing squad, the charismatic leader of a murderous robbery gang makes one last request: to have her confession heard by the priest who was once her lover.

    dpg Singularity
    Added an answer on November 8, 2014 at 9:30 am

    Please clarify their past relationship. I notice that in all the iterations, whenever some of us imply or explicitly state that they were more than just sweethearts, that they were lovers, you have reverted to the "sweetheart" tag to describe their earlier relationship. Is it your concept that theyRead more

    Please clarify their past relationship. I notice that in all the iterations, whenever some of us imply or explicitly state that they were more than just sweethearts, that they were lovers, you have reverted to the “sweetheart” tag to describe their earlier relationship.

    Is it your concept that they were never lovers, that whatever romantic current flowed between them was never consummated? And if that is the case, what is your reasoning for that choice?

    See less
    • 0
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
1 … 1,434 1,435 1,436 1,437 1,438 … 1,840

Sidebar

Stats

  • Loglines 8,022
  • Reviews 32,205
  • Best Reviews 629
  • Users 3,799

Adv 120x600

aalan

Explore

  • Signup

Footer

© 2022 Karel Segers. All Rights Reserved
With Love from Immersion Screenwriting.