Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
When a Barrister with early onset Alzheimers obtains a mysterious brief, he must break his professional code to restore justice by convincing a Court to set aside his own client?s acquittal.
>>> starts a new campaign of terror It's a new post-acquittal crime.? New facts, new evidence.? Prima facie, I don't see how any violation of the legal professional code is required to assist in prosecuting the case.? What's the legal and moral dilemma?
>>> starts a new campaign of terror
It’s a new post-acquittal crime.? New facts, new evidence.? Prima facie, I don’t see how any violation of the legal professional code is required to assist in prosecuting the case.? What’s the legal and moral dilemma?
See lessWhen a shelter bully blackmails a recovering junkie, the leader of a small group of homeless takes a heroic stand to protect her.
As the others said. And what is "an heroic stand"?? What happens at that moment?? How does that translate into an objective goal?
As the others said.
And what is “an heroic stand”?? What happens at that moment?? How does that translate into an objective goal?
See lessWhen a Barrister with early onset Alzheimers obtains a mysterious brief, he must break his professional code to restore justice by convincing a Court to set aside his own client?s acquittal.
On the legal technicalities entailed in the plot, your curriculum vitae indicates you know enough about the practice of law to write credibly about what he can do to right the wrong by violating the professional code.Agree with Richiev that "restore justice"? needs to be spelled out in specific termRead more
On the legal technicalities entailed in the plot, your curriculum vitae indicates you know enough about the practice of law to write credibly about what he can do to right the wrong by violating the professional code.
Agree with Richiev that “restore justice”? needs to be spelled out in specific terms of what’s at stake if he doesn’t succeed.? What is the cost of failure?? Who is the victim of the injustice?
And per mikepedley85,? why is Alzheimer’s? relevant?? It’s a good complication, but it needs to be more integrated into the logline.? Must he achieve his objective goal before he no longer has the memory to do so?? Does this imply that the outcome turns on a memory — something only he knows about or was a witness to. How is it a pivotal complication to how the plot plays out?
See less