A long life (working title)
Hunted by a post-apocalyptic ruling clique, the last survivor of a 21st century longevity experiment must decide whether to destroy the knowledge that had kept him alive for 300 years.
Share
Have an account? Sign In Now
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
That sounds good to me, but I thought you are supposed to put the inciting incident into the Logline and give an idea of the journey the main character has to take. OK, he must decide, but why? The problem now is that we haven’t teased out the story yet, which shows in the Logline. I’ll repost when we are done. Couple of more weeks, I reckon.
I agree with the above poster, and think that maybe you could just leave it at “The last survivor of a 21st century longevity experiment must decide whether to destroy the knowledge that had kept him alive for 300 years.”
Already in that scenario, I want to at least know ‘why’… It’s a tease at that point, but one that would compel me to ask further at any rate.
I like this idea but I think you should work on, “Post-apocalyptic ruling clique.” It doesn’t sound that menacing.
It sounds as if, Amber and Tammy the rest of the mean girls from high school are now in charge after the apocalypse. You might try Junta, that is a menacing type of ruling body.
However the idea, the longevity knowledge must be destroyed in order to keep it out of the wrong hands, is a great premise. A lot of fun world building.