When the public ignores evidence of violent rape by a demagogic president, a reporter convinces MIT nanobot engineers to help her surveil him, certain that airing his private moments will destroy him, but also naive to the many dangers of the plan.

The idea is interesting but I think the movie is 'outside' the logline. I mean, the real movie is about what happens after the reporter starts the?surveillance and the logline should capture that rahter than 'convincing the mit scientists of blah blah blah'.

Also, if ?Americans can invade the privacy of the White House with a nanobot what's to stop the Russians and the Chinese from doing likewise? ?(Who would have an even stronger motivation and stakes).

Now there might be a story hook: ?she leads a team that develops nanobots to get on the inside ? and discovers that the Russians and Chinese are also snooping on POTUS with nanobots.

fwiw

Also, if ?Americans can invade the privacy of the White House with a nanobot what's to stop the Russians and the Chinese from doing likewise? ?(Who would have an even stronger motivation and stakes).

Now there might be a story hook: ?she leads a team that develops nanobots to get on the inside ? and discovers that the Russians and Chinese are also snooping on POTUS with nanobots.

fwiw