Sign Up Sign Up

Captcha Click on image to update the captcha.

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In Sign In

Forgot Password?

If you'd like access, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Captcha Click on image to update the captcha.

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sorry, you do not have permission to ask a question, You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

To see everything, Sign Up Here

Sorry, you do not have permission to ask a question, You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

To see everything, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Logline It! Logo Logline It! Logo
Sign InSign Up

Logline It!

Logline It! Navigation

  • Sign Up
  • Logline Generator
  • Learn our simple Logline Formula
  • Search Loglines
Search
Post Your Logline

Mobile menu

Close
Post Your Logline
  • Signup
  • Sign Up
  • Logline Generator
  • Learn our simple Logline Formula
  • Search Loglines
  • About
  • Questions
  • Answers
  • Best Answers
  1. Posted: July 14, 2014In: Public

    In a world where fictitious characters and mankind co-exist equally, a stressed-out-psychotic film director filming his latest movie, fires, his egomaniacal narrator, a pixy, who purposely sets out to sabotage his movie.

    dpg Singularity
    Added an answer on July 19, 2014 at 5:57 am

    The logline doesn't make sense to me without establishing the context, "a world where fictitious characters and mankind co-exist". Who is the protagonist, the director or the pixy? What's at stake that I should care about who wins, who loses?

    The logline doesn’t make sense to me without establishing the context, “a world where fictitious characters and mankind co-exist”.

    Who is the protagonist, the director or the pixy? What’s at stake that I should care about who wins, who loses?

    See less
    • 0
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
  2. Posted: July 19, 2014In: Public

    A dog-headed novice leaves his monastery at the command of the elder to capture and tame the remaining mythological beasts which threaten 4th century Jerusalem.

    dpg Singularity
    Added an answer on July 19, 2014 at 4:57 am

    So the head monk doesn't have enough faith that God can take care of the situation in Jerusalem Himself, that he dispatches a "dog-headed novitiate"? Sorry to be flippant, but why would the elder send, of all people, a novitiate, a babe in the faith? And is 'dog-headed' supposed to refer to a characRead more

    So the head monk doesn’t have enough faith that God can take care of the situation in Jerusalem Himself, that he dispatches a “dog-headed novitiate”?

    Sorry to be flippant, but why would the elder send, of all people, a novitiate, a babe in the faith? And is ‘dog-headed’ supposed to refer to a character flaw? And why are the mythological beasts threatening Jerusalem in the 4th century CE, not the 3rd, or 5th or some other historical period?

    See less
    • 0
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
  3. Posted: July 19, 2014In: Public

    A dog-headed novice leaves his monastery at the command of the elder to capture and tame the remaining mythological beasts which threaten 4th century Jerusalem.

    dpg Singularity
    Added an answer on July 19, 2014 at 4:57 am

    So the head monk doesn't have enough faith that God can take care of the situation in Jerusalem Himself, that he dispatches a "dog-headed novitiate"? Sorry to be flippant, but why would the elder send, of all people, a novitiate, a babe in the faith? And is 'dog-headed' supposed to refer to a characRead more

    So the head monk doesn’t have enough faith that God can take care of the situation in Jerusalem Himself, that he dispatches a “dog-headed novitiate”?

    Sorry to be flippant, but why would the elder send, of all people, a novitiate, a babe in the faith? And is ‘dog-headed’ supposed to refer to a character flaw? And why are the mythological beasts threatening Jerusalem in the 4th century CE, not the 3rd, or 5th or some other historical period?

    See less
    • 0
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
1 … 1,571 1,572 1,573 1,574 1,575 … 1,840

Sidebar

Stats

  • Loglines 8,021
  • Reviews 32,205
  • Best Reviews 629
  • Users 3,799

Adv 120x600

aalan

Explore

  • Signup

Footer

© 2022 Karel Segers. All Rights Reserved
With Love from Immersion Screenwriting.