Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
When the UK’s top entrepreneur kills his whole family then commits suicide, a washed-up cop, grieving widow and new age guru must team up to find out what’s causing this sudden epidemic of high profile bloody events.
I? also like Richiev's take because it focuses on a specific protagonist.? The protagonist's actions are clearly motivated:? it's personal.? She has? very personal stakes in the case.? Whereas the original version just throws it out there that a trio MUST? investigate the problem.? Well, why MUST thRead more
I? also like Richiev’s take because it focuses on a specific protagonist.? The protagonist’s actions are clearly motivated:? it’s personal.? She has? very personal stakes in the case.? Whereas the original version just throws it out there that a trio MUST? investigate the problem.? Well, why MUST they get involved?? Why would? 3 disparate characters team up? over a murder-suicide?? What’s their motivation?? What skin do they have in the game?
And not only is it easier for an audience to get involved in the story through one person ‘s point of view rather than several, as mikepedley85 noted, but it is also often easier to sell the script.
See lessIs this a valid log line? Or is it too vague?
>>>He must untainted his name because he didn?t commit the crimes committed. Okay.? And that should be clear in the logline.? The stakes are personal:? it's more than just the family name; his objective goal is exoneration, to prove his innocence.
>>>He must untainted his name because he didn?t commit the crimes committed.
Okay.? And that should be clear in the logline.? The stakes are personal:? it’s more than just the family name; his objective goal is exoneration, to prove his innocence.
See lessIs this a valid log line? Or is it too vague?
Upon 2nd reading, I see that I misconceived the project.My SOP is to read a logline? fast and furious.? For which I don't apologize.? Because that's the way movie makers will read it.? There's a 5-10 second window of opportunity to get their attention and for them to get the story line.? If they areRead more
Upon 2nd reading, I see that I misconceived the project.
My SOP is to read a logline? fast and furious.? For which I don’t apologize.? Because that’s the way movie makers will read it.? There’s a 5-10 second window of opportunity to get their attention and for them to get the story line.? If they aren’t interested, if they don’t understand? they just move on.
I see now that the protagonist of the story is not the recipient but rather the deceased organ donor.? ? I suggest the logline needs to be tweaked to make it clearer.?
But my other questions still pertain.? Why must he clear a tainted past?? Since he’s “dead”, what does he stand to lose — what more can he lose — if he doesn’t
See less