Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
An emotionally-stunted, apathetic playboy learns to grieve his father’s death and appreciate life from a terminally ill woman, who loves life.
I think the concept has promise but needs refocusing.? What is the visual for "appreciate life"?? Doesn't that refer to a subjective need rather than an objective goal?Likewise what's the visual for "grieve his father's death"?? He breaks down and cries?? And then what?? What is his specific objectiRead more
I think the concept has promise but needs refocusing.? What is the visual for “appreciate life”?? Doesn’t that refer to a subjective need rather than an objective goal?
Likewise what’s the visual for “grieve his father’s death”?? He breaks down and cries?? And then what?? What is his specific objective goal after that?
Loglines are about the pursuit of objective goals, not the discovery of and catharsis of emotional needs.? An objective goal is what a protagonist consciously, intentionally, willfully strives to do or acquire.
Does any protagonist say at the end of Act 1:? “I’m going to learn to grieve my father’s death — or die trying.”? No, of course not.? And neither is he aware of his need to appreciate life at the end of Act 1.? If he is by the end of Act 1, then the dying woman has served her dramatic purpose as defined in the logline.? End of story.? So he can’t be consciously, intentionally willfully seeking to appreciate life, either.
As a result of his relationship with the dying woman, what becomes his objective goal?? What does he consciously, intentionally, willfully decide to do?? And what person, situation or object stands in the way?
?
See lessDuring a Hollywood party, Marlon Brando and Montgomery Clift compete to prove who is the greatest actor – and end up using James Dean as a pawn in their game of psychological oneupmanship.
As Leon Davis said.? How many viewers today are aware of the importance of these actors.? Marlon Brando?? Probably.? James Dean?? Maybe.? Montgomery Clift?? Doubtful.And there's nothing important at stake.?? It's an exercise in celebrity vanity by Brando and Clift.? Who cares about who wins?? Why shRead more
As Leon Davis said.? How many viewers today are aware of the importance of these actors.? Marlon Brando?? Probably.? James Dean?? Maybe.? Montgomery Clift?? Doubtful.
And there’s nothing important at stake.?? It’s an exercise in celebrity vanity by Brando and Clift.? Who cares about who wins?? Why should anyone care?
?
See lessAfter mythology’s most vicious monsters and history’s most heinous criminals escape from hell, a neurotic college-sophomore finds herself imbued with the power to send these evildoers back from whence they came.
Too many villains.Less is more.Focus? on one alpha-bad dude or dame.
Too many villains.
Less is more.
Focus? on one alpha-bad dude or dame.
See less