Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
Obsessed with exposing the private shenanigans of public figures, a betrayed,poisoned and left-to-die anonymous newspaper columnist and voyeur,shrinks instead,witnesses a murder and must get to the police before he’s caught again.
Agree with Nir Shelter that the answers to the basic questions should be in the form or short, easy to read sentences. ?By short I mean, no more than 10 words for each answer. ?And that's just for the first cut, the rough draft. ?That can be tough to do, but that's the purpose of the questions and tRead more
Agree with Nir Shelter that the answers to the basic questions should be in the form or short, easy to read sentences. ?By short I mean, no more than 10 words for each answer. ?And that’s just for the first cut, the rough draft. ?That can be tough to do, but that’s the purpose of the questions and the answers, to distill the plot down to it’s essence, ?to realize ?Ludwig Mies van der Rohe’s dictum, “Less is more.”
The effort required to compose a concise, clear logline is also a gauge of the concept’s marketability in the sense of how easy is it to explain to others. ?Alas, in this era of multitasking, fragment attention spans, you’ve really only got one opportunity and a few precious seconds to grab and hold movie makers attention.
It ain’t the way it ought to be — but that’s the way it is.
See lessObsessed with exposing the private shenanigans of public figures, a betrayed,poisoned and left-to-die anonymous newspaper columnist and voyeur,shrinks instead,witnesses a murder and must get to the police before he’s caught again.
Thanks for taking the time to answer the basic questions, ?decompose the story into it's primary elements. ?This clarifies the through line of the plot.Unfortunately, there is one big knot in the through line I am unable to untie and straighten out. I am unable to suspend disbelief and buy into theRead more
Thanks for taking the time to answer the basic questions, ?decompose the story into it’s primary elements. ?This clarifies the through line of the plot.
Unfortunately, there is one big knot in the through line I am unable to untie and straighten out. I am unable to suspend disbelief and buy into the “diablous ex machina” trope, that the poison causes the protagonist to merely shrink instead of die.
A “diabolous ex machina” trope is the reverse of the “deus ex machina” trope. ?The ‘deus” trope involves some arbitrary person, object or event that appears out of the ?nowhere with no explanation, setup or foreshadowing ?and saves the day for the protagonist. In ?contrast, the “diabolus” trope entails some arbitrary person, object or event that appears out of nowhere with no explanation , setup or foreshadowing and?ruins the day?for the protagonist.
Of course, ?you can’t explain every critical element of a plot in a logline. ?And?a screenwriter has license to introduce novel and strange elements in the first Act ?(only) of the script ?But before you can use ye ol’ “Incredible Shrinking Man” gimmick in the script, you gotta waste valuable page space explaining how it is possible. ?Who concocted the poison? ?Why?
?(And because it’s being used, the proper genre to describe the story is either SciFi or Fantasy ?rather than crime.)
A logline should raise curiosity, not questions. ?Unfortunately, the “diabolus ex machina” in this premise, the “shrinking” poison raises more questions than curiosity in my mind. ?Like: ?Why, ?for the purpose of this story, must the character shrink? ?What’s the dramatic point of shrinking the character other than making the plot more difficult for him? ?What theme are you trying to explore with this ‘diabolous ex machina’ trope?
Other people may respond differently, have no problem no questions about the “diabolus” trope. ?But I do.
fwiw
See lessWhen a dangerous spirit-god is summoned, a fearful college student must attempt to rescue his adventurous best friend whom the spirit-god has possessed.
Why was the spirit summoned? ?The summoning may have back-fired, had reverse or unintended consequences. ?Who summed the spirit (the flesh-and-blood antagonist? ?the victim?) ?for what original objective goal?
Why was the spirit summoned? ?The summoning may have back-fired, had reverse or unintended consequences. ?Who summed the spirit (the flesh-and-blood antagonist? ?the victim?) ?for what original objective goal?
See less