Already a member?
3 reviews
Strengths Specificity Causality and coherence Action, not decision Concision No hedging
Fairly straight forward. Might use the word "rookie" rather than "new" to describe the marshal. Might also add a ticking clock element to the logline to escalate the sense of urgency; that is, how many minutes he has to foil the terrorist's plan.
Obviously, the logline plot will be associated with the 911 tragedy. How is this fictional plot as dramatic as what really happened on 911? Is there a USP, a unique selling point, that distinguishes this fictional hijacking from the real hijackings (other than the target)?
"Hijacked" is the correct spelling. Post-9/11, the cockpits are sealed and pilots won't open for any reason - even if every passenger is murdered at the door. F16s were scrambled during 9/11 and D.C. now has a battery of surface-to-air missiles. So I don't believe it'd be possible to hijack a plane in 2026 and, were it done, the plane would be blown out of the sky in a matter of minutes before it reached a population center.
UNITED 93 did a compelling look at a 9/11 hijacking, btw.
You also have no protagonist description other than he's the U.S. Marshall on the plane, so perhaps get into the 'DIE HARD on a plan' spin suggesting his arc.
When a flight from NY to LA is high jacked, a rookie US Marshal must take down a terrorist before he crashes an airplane into a sports arena.