


Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
A bounty hunter arriving from an alternate reality holds bar patrons hostage in order to trap a fugitive killer but soon discovers one of the hostages may be more dangerous than the expected fugitive.
You're logline and concept, whilst aiming to titillate by way of describing a 'time/ alternate reality' concept, only comes across as confusing and unclear, and I'm left with a zero care factor because I have no reason to care about the plight of your main character. As others have said -- the higheRead more
You’re logline and concept, whilst aiming to titillate by way of describing a ‘time/ alternate reality’ concept, only comes across as confusing and unclear, and I’m left with a zero care factor because I have no reason to care about the plight of your main character. As others have said — the higher the sci-fi concept the greater the need to focus on the human struggle/ element in a logline… this is what ultimately audiences latch onto, imo anyway — even if they don’t realise it consciously… so — if you want the logline to be more engaging focus on simplifying it — be clearer with what the main character HAS to do, ensuring we understand WHY they have to do it, and less on the sci-fi elements. Below is obviously just an example, and not supposed to be replicating your main plot line:
A multiverse hopping bounty hunter must uncover a shape shifting psychopathic killer amidst the patrons of a bar before it escapes onto the streets London”
Also – in regards to …”There’s nothing that stifles creativity more than rules…” — imo, I think the opposite is in fact true. The rules in fact allow you to channel your ideas into something that is communicable on a large scale. Sure — the greatest film makers are known for breaking rules — but I can’t think of any that started out as rule breakers… they mastered the craft/ rules before they broke them — or, you have to fully comprehend the rule, understand why it’s a rule in the first place, before you can break it (and so, fully understand the implication of breaking it).
Anyway — best of luck with it.
T.
See lessIn 2097, Islamic State?s genius operative befriends and covertly recruits the CIA?s foremost agent and develops a weapon like nothing in history or fiction.
I'd echo both DPG and nicholasandrewhalls -- the pov is from the IS operative, which paints him as the hero as opposed to the antagonist -- but that seems odd for a couple of reasons: 1. He's an IS Operative... currently the western worlds arch enemy... it's a hard pill to swallow (unless they're yoRead more
I’d echo both DPG and nicholasandrewhalls — the pov is from the IS operative, which paints him as the hero as opposed to the antagonist — but that seems odd for a couple of reasons: 1. He’s an IS Operative… currently the western worlds arch enemy… it’s a hard pill to swallow (unless they’re your intended audience..???). 2. It’s set 83 years in the future… that’s a long time for IS to still be kickin round; it also sets the film up as SCI-FI, which is really the cousin to the ACTION genre, and action films don’t typically have the bad guy as the lead… defines it as original, but not necessarily successful — imo anyway.
If, on the other hand, the CIA guy is your hero, then I think you should begin the logline with him — it’s a subtle but dramatic difference that places your hero upfront, and we get the logline/ story from his pov… start with him, and tell us what he has to do to get out of his dilemma with IS. I get intrigued by loglines when I can see WHAT it is the hero has to do… my desire to see or read a film is driven by wanting to know HOW the hero will pull it off…
Best of luck with it.
See lessIn 2097, Islamic State?s genius operative befriends and covertly recruits the CIA?s foremost agent and develops a weapon like nothing in history or fiction.
I'd echo both DPG and nicholasandrewhalls -- the pov is from the IS operative, which paints him as the hero as opposed to the antagonist -- but that seems odd for a couple of reasons: 1. He's an IS Operative... currently the western worlds arch enemy... it's a hard pill to swallow (unless they're yoRead more
I’d echo both DPG and nicholasandrewhalls — the pov is from the IS operative, which paints him as the hero as opposed to the antagonist — but that seems odd for a couple of reasons: 1. He’s an IS Operative… currently the western worlds arch enemy… it’s a hard pill to swallow (unless they’re your intended audience..???). 2. It’s set 83 years in the future… that’s a long time for IS to still be kickin round; it also sets the film up as SCI-FI, which is really the cousin to the ACTION genre, and action films don’t typically have the bad guy as the lead… defines it as original, but not necessarily successful — imo anyway.
If, on the other hand, the CIA guy is your hero, then I think you should begin the logline with him — it’s a subtle but dramatic difference that places your hero upfront, and we get the logline/ story from his pov… start with him, and tell us what he has to do to get out of his dilemma with IS. I get intrigued by loglines when I can see WHAT it is the hero has to do… my desire to see or read a film is driven by wanting to know HOW the hero will pull it off…
Best of luck with it.
See less