Have an account? Sign In Now
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
A dissociative identity disorder sufferer starts hunting a clandestine agency who, he believes, have artificially created his condition to hide a ruthless assassin within his own mind.
I guess my take on this would be: He assumes that he is the primary persona E.G. he is the host, but he will actually turn out to be the Secondary Persona created artificially... so using the Hyde and Jekyll example my MC would actually be the Hyde in the duality and the killer / monster the PrimaryRead more
I guess my take on this would be: He assumes that he is the primary persona E.G. he is the host, but he will actually turn out to be the Secondary Persona created artificially… so using the Hyde and Jekyll example my MC would actually be the Hyde in the duality and the killer / monster the Primary Persona.
Like I said I need to alter the logline as it is a bit all over the shop, but I want there to be an elements of what is real, what is fantasy and has he just snapped and is there no one after him at all?
Hopefully a simplified logline will help with these questions.
See lessA dissociative identity disorder sufferer starts hunting a clandestine agency who, he believes, have artificially created his condition to hide a ruthless assassin within his own mind.
It does and I appreciate the help, I will look to simplify and streamline
It does and I appreciate the help, I will look to simplify and streamline
See lessWith only 24 hours before her life support machine is switched off, a coma patient is given a second chance when she is recruited by an organisation that operates within the human subconscious to help stop a terror group that controls people via their dreams.
Well, I would have explained this - granted I am still early doors research wise - however, it would have been something along the lines of either a) The limitations of the technology back then meant only one person at a time could be hacked, and their were numerous methods that could block the signRead more
Well, I would have explained this – granted I am still early doors research wise – however, it would have been something along the lines of either
a) The limitations of the technology back then meant only one person at a time could be hacked, and their were numerous methods that could block the signal etc and various scientists within the programme were taken out or died.
b) The US lead a strike on the base that contained the device, and destroyed it without knowing – or perhaps some did – and a back up machine has been either built and / or discovered.
c) The device itself started to act on it’s own, and thus was shut down and couldn’t be controlled.
Long story short, once I have continued the research I will have a feasible reason for your question.
See less