Sign Up Sign Up

Captcha Click on image to update the captcha.

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In Sign In

Forgot Password?

If you'd like access, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Captcha Click on image to update the captcha.

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sorry, you do not have permission to ask a question, You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

To see everything, Sign Up Here

Sorry, you do not have permission to ask a question, You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

To see everything, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Logline It! Logo Logline It! Logo
Sign InSign Up

Logline It!

Logline It! Navigation

  • Sign Up
  • Logline Generator
  • Learn our simple Logline Formula
  • Search Loglines
Search
Post Your Logline

Mobile menu

Close
Post Your Logline
  • Signup
  • Sign Up
  • Logline Generator
  • Learn our simple Logline Formula
  • Search Loglines
  • About
  • Questions
  • Answers
  • Best Answers
  1. Posted: April 25, 2019In: Thriller

    In 1961, a British double agent, living under a new alias, must thwart a corrupt former colleague who threatens to expose his existence to a secret organisation of Nazis, unless he takes part in his complex game of human chess.

    Robb Ross Samurai
    Added an answer on May 4, 2019 at 6:31 am

    Forced and pawn are not proactive.? His plan within the situation should be stated.>>when he?s summoned back to action and seduced into another missionFirst he returns on his own and then he's blackmailed? Why two steps?Since he's a former double-agent, better to include who he is now.A joylesRead more

    Forced and pawn are not proactive.? His plan within the situation should be stated.

    >>when he?s summoned back to action and seduced into another mission

    First he returns on his own and then he’s blackmailed? Why two steps?

    Since he’s a former double-agent, better to include who he is now.

    A joyless life on the FR is ironic and the opposite American being there is another irony, so that feels odd. What’s the point of the protag living there? Why not have him and the reader enter the location from outside?

    Someone’s question from earlier wasn’t addressed, why this whole production to trap the Nazi instead of a direct, non-blackmail plan or notifying? law enforcement or Israel?

    What’s the series, a different mission every episode? How long can the blackmail last??? Try a series logline, another pilot logline, and a paragraph about the first season.

    My two cents.

    See less
    • 0
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
  2. Posted: May 2, 2019In: Noir

    When a Texas cotton farmer’s land stops yielding crops, he teams up with an old friend to distribute VHS pornography tapes; leaving his family and slipping into a world of depravity and greed to become the undisputed King of Pornography in Texas. (1980)

    Robb Ross Samurai
    Added an answer on May 4, 2019 at 12:17 am

    Agree with the others. As well, clarify if it's production and not just distribution because it's hard to see depravity with the latter. With depravity, greed becomes secondary or an assumed part of it.Even if this is based on someone real, try to strengthen the hook and family part so that this canRead more

    Agree with the others. As well, clarify if it’s production and not just distribution because it’s hard to see depravity with the latter. With depravity, greed becomes secondary or an assumed part of it.

    Even if this is based on someone real, try to strengthen the hook and family part so that this can be more than ‘Boogie Nights in Texas’.

    See less
    • 0
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
  3. Posted: April 30, 2019In: Noir

    Trapped in an abandon house by a storm two gangsters engage in a battle of wits and violence try to ensure their own safety regardless of whose side arrives first.

    Robb Ross Samurai
    Added an answer on May 4, 2019 at 12:04 am

    It's true we don't have to like a protag, but then we should relate to him in some way or see some hope in him. TV and movies are different and a bad guy movie protag is a rare success, even among the low-budget thrillers on Netflix. (Not bad for the writer to get produced and released on Netflix, tRead more

    It’s true we don’t have to like a protag, but then we should relate to him in some way or see some hope in him.

    TV and movies are different and a bad guy movie protag is a rare success, even among the low-budget thrillers on Netflix. (Not bad for the writer to get produced and released on Netflix, the point is to consider if the story is as strong as it can be. ) However, Breaking Bad supports my point because we relate to Walter White in the pilot as a smart and nice family man who’s been dealt a bad hand in life, and then we relate to his motive of wanting to provide for his children. Something like Training Day with bad cop Denzel doesn’t even compare to this story because the audience relates to the co-lead Ethan Hawke’s character and he’s the one with the arc.

    With one being a snitch in hiding, it sounds like there is a grey-area guy the reader (not yet an audience!) will have hopes for, at least at the start.

    >> Hiding for years after being a snitch, a man is forced to provide refuge to an associate from his criminal past…

    Is this still in the warehouse during the storm? Say more than hiding, like what he does for work or if he’s literally on the run or doesn’t settle anywhere for long. Say more than associate or specify the past crime.

    >>He tries to leverage the criminal?s situation to his advantage triggering a battle of wills, threats and eventually death.

    Vague and confusing. Next attempt, add specifics. What is the snitch’s plan? What is his objective? What is the conflict, what makes it hard for him to achieve it? Don’t they both have leverage over each other, not just the snitch over the criminal? No need to reveal anything from Act III and improving the rest should imply it.

    See less
    • 0
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
1 … 6 7 8 9 10 … 41

Sidebar

Stats

  • Loglines 7,997
  • Reviews 32,189
  • Best Reviews 629
  • Users 3,710

screenwriting courses

Adv 120x600

aalan

Explore

  • Signup

Footer

© 2022 Karel Segers. All Rights Reserved
With Love from Immersion Screenwriting.