Have an account? Sign In Now
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
"When the President is kidnapped, the First Lady, a former Marine, leads a rescue mission to take down the terrorist with direct roots to the White House"
I should add that the concept is brilliant, btw...
I should add that the concept is brilliant, btw…
See less"When the President is kidnapped, the First Lady, a former Marine, leads a rescue mission to take down the terrorist with direct roots to the White House"
Jamesmichael is right on target, I think. Grammatically (and I'm NO expert here), the last half of the line might be better suited in the front half, while also highlighting the "hook"- First Lady Marine- i.e: "When POTUS is kidnapped by terrorist with ties to the White House, a retired Special ForcRead more
Jamesmichael is right on target, I think. Grammatically (and I’m NO expert here), the last half of the line might be better suited in the front half, while also highlighting the “hook”- First Lady Marine- i.e:
“When POTUS is kidnapped by terrorist with ties to the White House, a retired Special Forces Marine leads the rescue mission to save the leader of the free world- her husband.”
See lessAfter his daughter is killed by a drunk driver who goes free on a technicality, a circuit court justice takes sentencing into his own hands
"freed on a technicality..." Great logline; concept though is a bit cliche. A different twist having the judge be the avenger, but "circuit court"? Too menial for my tastes. Supreme Court? Now, we're talking! Make the judge a real libby-lib type who lets the heinous among us walk free on technicalitRead more
“freed on a technicality…” Great logline; concept though is a bit cliche.
A different twist having the judge be the avenger, but “circuit court”? Too menial for my tastes. Supreme Court? Now, we’re talking! Make the judge a real libby-lib type who lets the heinous among us walk free on technicalities, and you have some strong irony.
Still, when it is all said and done, still sounds like I’ve seen it.
See less