Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
A failed actor awakens from a six-day coma following a car accident believing he is Hollywood star Matthew McConnaughey. Despite widespread confusion from his family and friends, he attempts to rejuvenate his movie career.
"When a short coma leaves him with the illusion he is a successful movie star, a struggling actor must..." Must what? The second sentence is just vague. As Richiev says, no specific goal or conflict, esp. one that ties well with his illusion of being Matthew M.
“When a short coma leaves him with the illusion he is a successful movie star, a struggling actor must…”
Must what? The second sentence is just vague. As Richiev says, no specific goal or conflict, esp. one that ties well with his illusion of being Matthew M.
See lessA Mafia family in grave danger after testifying against a notorious organized crime figure are invited to take part in an experimental government witness protection program where their consciousnesses will be uploaded to a simulated reality.
I don't get it. How does the upload protect them? How does it stop their enemy from wiping out their physical bodies?
I don’t get it. How does the upload protect them? How does it stop their enemy from wiping out their physical bodies?
See lessAfter she recovers photographs of her spouse raping her, a respected lawyer battles for justice to transform South Carolina?s viewpoints on marital rape.
First of all, I second what dpg says: changing viewpoint is not what lawyers fight for. She needs to change the system. The law itself. I don't understand the inciting incident. Recover from whom? If her husband has raped her once, recovering the photographs does not sound like a strong enough incitRead more
First of all, I second what dpg says: changing viewpoint is not what lawyers fight for. She needs to change the system. The law itself.
I don’t understand the inciting incident. Recover from whom? If her husband has raped her once, recovering the photographs does not sound like a strong enough inciting incident. The rape itself sounds like an inciting incident.
On the other hand, if her husband has been raping her for years, what is it that pushes her into defending herself now? Again, recovering some evidence is not an inciting incident, but part of the defense.
Finally, why have the lawyer and the victim be the same person? Consider splitting them into two characters. I have a hunch that this would create a more interesting cast.
See less