A female bounty hunter who hallucinates slices of the future saves a man’s life in order to collect the bounty on his violent time-travelling future self.

FFF has a point that high-stake bounties are usually dead or alive. ?All one has to do is produce a body.

But if should she have competition, a ?bad-ass male rival, who is determined to just kill him off, deliver a body? ?Somebody else wants to collect on the (future) bounty? ?Then she has a motivation to "save" him for her own benefit in the future. ?That's her preferred m.o. in contrast to the bad-ass, deliver them alive.

Anyway, I like the concept. ?What I like about this logline is that the questions it?raises about problems?(and I have a few) are far exceeded by the questions it raises about possibilities.

Best wishes for this story.

FFF has a point that high-stake bounties are usually dead or alive. ?All one has to do is produce a body.

But if should she have competition, a ?bad-ass male rival, who is determined to just kill him off, deliver a body? ?Somebody else wants to collect on the (future) bounty? ?Then she has a motivation to "save" him for her own benefit in the future. ?That's her preferred m.o. in contrast to the bad-ass, deliver them alive.

Anyway, I like the concept. ?What I like about this logline is that the questions it?raises about problems?(and I have a few) are far exceeded by the questions it raises about possibilities.

Best wishes for this story.

Hello, I think I don't get it right...
usually (not necessarely) you collect a bounty when you kill someone or when you capture someone, not when you save someone...

Is your idea that a criminal in the future pays the girl who sees the future to protect?him in the past?

About, the main character, can't you say she's a clairvoyant? A clairvoyant doesn't see the whole future but only some 'slices' and it's often confused and ambiguous, I think it fits the charcter.

One more thing,"save" is vague and not effective since we don't know from what the man is saved.